Dev branch will receive only approved code (more stable, less potential bugs)Įven as a small company, we struggle to find the right process to perform code reviews.Dev can easily relate their feature (pull request ) with bugs, tasks, and stories. ![]() Corrupted commits don’t affect other team members.It forces the project to be split into little features.Their pull request then has to be reviewed and approved by the project lead, or another member of the team. Once a feature is considered done, the developer has to create a pull request to merge their feature into the develop branch. All work related to the feature they are working on will be done there. Each developer is required to create a feature branch off the develop branch. With Git Flow branching strategy and some settings on Dev Ops no commits can be done directly on the develop branch. What features are being worked on and by who. Unit Tests can’t be done on dev because the feature isn’t completed yet. Which sometimes ends with stressful and complete chaos for a short (sometimes long) period time on the entire team. A new coder on the team can break the project branch with one wrong commit and affect all other members. Having multiple developers working on the same projects isn’t always easy especially when you try to not step on each other’s feet. This is a summary of what we tried to achieve and why we think these tools combined have helped us in many areas including collaboration, git concept learning curve, code quality, code consistency, and code stability. Merging and Resolving Conflicts using GitKrakenĬhallenges and problems we tried to resolve.Setting Branch Policies and Pull Request.Initialize Git Flow branches from GitKraken.Why git is called a distributed source control system?.Pull Request & Azure DevOps to the rescue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |